<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 14 (filtered medium)"><!--[if !mso]><style>v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
o\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
w\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
.shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
</style><![endif]--><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Tahoma;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Consolas;
panose-1:2 11 6 9 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0cm;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
pre
{mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"HTML Preformatted Char";
margin:0cm;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:"Courier New";}
span.HTMLPreformattedChar
{mso-style-name:"HTML Preformatted Char";
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-link:"HTML Preformatted";
font-family:Consolas;}
span.EmailStyle19
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:612.0pt 792.0pt;
margin:72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]--></head><body lang=EN-AU link=blue vlink=purple style='word-wrap: break-word;-webkit-nbsp-mode: space;-webkit-line-break: after-white-space'><div class=WordSection1><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'>For what it’s worth, I find Russ’ points quite compelling.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'>That said, here is a presentation I gave in 2011 that contains a lot of the diagrams that Kavouss is requesting. Jari may wish to use those.<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'>They can be found at:<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'><a href="http://www.internetsociety.org.au/Events/">http://www.internetsociety.org.au/Events/</a> <o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'>Near the top there is a section:<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal>30 September 2011: <a href="http://www.internetsociety.org.au/Events/ietf-overview-ACS-TSA20110930.pdf">'Request for What?? - Participating in Internet Standards Processes'</a>, presented by Narelle Clark, Vice-President of ISOC-AU for the <a href="http://www.acs.org.au/acstsa/index.cfm">ACS Telecommunications SIG</a>.<span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'><o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'>Regards<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'>Narelle<o:p></o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><div style='border:none;border-left:solid blue 1.5pt;padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 4.0pt'><div><div style='border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm'><p class=MsoNormal><b><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'>From:</span></b><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'> Internal-cg [mailto:internal-cg-bounces@ianacg.org] <b>On Behalf Of </b>Russ Mundy<br><b>Sent:</b> Monday, 9 March 2015 10:07 AM<br><b>To:</b> Kavouss Arasteh<br><b>Cc:</b> internal-cg@ianacg.org<br><b>Subject:</b> Re: [Internal-cg] Fwd: Information requested<o:p></o:p></span></p></div></div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Kavouss & Colleagues,<o:p></o:p></p><div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>This thread seems to have two fundamental issues:<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>First, how understandable (or non-understandable) are the accountability aspects of the numbers and protocol parameters proposals;<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>Second, there is some requirement for the accountability aspects of the three operational communities to be compared or combined in some way.<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>- With respect to the first, I believe that both the numbers and protocol parameters existing proposals are each sufficiently clear and complete in their accountability descriptions. Although it might be useful to have some graphical illustrations of their respective processes, I do not see that it is within the remit of the ICG to require these illustrations. <o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal> -- If ICG members (or others) want additional information about what is currently defined in NTIA-ICANN contract, I would suggest reviewing SAC-068 and, if needed, the Contract itself and the referenced agreements. My personal interpretation of what these say is that the numbers operational community and the protocol parameters operational community each have separate, independent agreements outside of the Contract and, further, those agreements are the dominant authority (not the Contract) for how the IANA functions should be carried out for each respective operational community. In short, if these operational communities are satisfied with the accountability mechanisms for their respective functions, it is not within the ICG remit to question or challenge them since the Contract has already put those communities in charge of their respective portions of the IANA functions. (I’d also like to note that there are no similar such provisions for the names community.)<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>With respect to the second issue, I see no need (let alone a requirement) to compare the accountability processes between any of the three OCs. This point is emphasized by the fact the current Contract says accountability between two of these communities is defined by the respective operational communities via agreements that are separate and independent from the Contract. When the ICG receives the names proposal, we (the ICG) will have to make a judgement about the compatibility and interoperability of that proposal with the other two - I do not think that it would not be appropriate or fruitful to try to compare the names accountability processes with either the numbers or protocol parameters proposals since each OC is dealing with separate issues and challenges which will require different approaches to accountability.<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>Russ (M)<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div><div><div><div><div><p class=MsoNormal>On Mar 8, 2015, at 11:52 AM, Kavouss Arasteh <<a href="mailto:kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com">kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<o:p></o:p></p></div><p class=MsoNormal><br><br><o:p></o:p></p><div><div><p class=MsoNormal>Dear Jopseph,<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>May I explain a little bit the objectives of the querry.<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>The terms and condition and status of accountabilty currently applied to Protocole and numbers are not clear.<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>The presentation of these accountability are too complex and it is not clear who is accountable to whom<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>I raised this question to Jari , representing Protocol and he agreed to provide diagram clearly indicating the hierarchy of the implementation and application of the accountavblity as curremntly practiced.<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>The same is valid for numbers<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>Then in regard with the accountabilty after transition sebveral paragraphs spread over various pages deal with7 addressing the post transition accountabilty.<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>For me as an ICG member .it is not clear what are the consequence of transition in regard with accoutabilty before and after transition .<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>For thse reasons I asked for a comparative tabulated form indicating the accountabilty at various level and the corresponding hierarchy before and after transition.<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>Should you have a better way to have such a tabular form which I referred to it as comparative and you seems not to be happy with such term ,please guide me.<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>But currently the suituation is tiotally vague<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>Regards<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>Kavouss <o:p></o:p></p></div></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><div><p class=MsoNormal>2015-03-08 16:29 GMT+01:00 joseph alhadeff <<a href="mailto:joseph.alhadeff@oracle.com" target="_blank">joseph.alhadeff@oracle.com</a>>:<o:p></o:p></p><div><p class=MsoNormal>Colleagues<br><br>Perhaps we should develop a set of questions for all communities to answer. I'm not sure that its appropriate to ask communities to develop comparative documents.<br><br>Best-<br><br>Joe<o:p></o:p></p><div><div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><div><p class=MsoNormal>On 3/8/2015 11:00 AM, Kavouss Arasteh wrote:<o:p></o:p></p></div><blockquote style='margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt'><div><div><div><p class=MsoNormal>Step 2 ,ICG Assessement of Cummunity proposals<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>Dear Vice chair, <o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>May you please ask TWO OPERATIONAL COMMUNITIES a) ProtoCOL & Parameters and b) Nummbers to Kindly provide the followings;<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>A COMPARATIVE Table indicating the prcess of accountability currently in force and implemented and those which will be required after Transitiion.<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>It would be useful to have that comparative Table enabling ICG Members to better undersatnd how the accountability of Protocol Parameter and Numbers are affected by Transition.<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>The reports of these two communities are difficult to make such a comparision.<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>Without that I will have serious difficulties to comment on the exacteness and appropriateness of the content of these two comminities on accountability before and after transition.<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>By the way, Jari promised to provide a graphic Diagram regarding internal accountability being carried out by IETF<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>mOREOVER, aLAN bARRET / Paul Wilson ,are respectfully requested to provide similar graphic Diagram about the accountability currently in force in RIRs ,in particular that RIRs have a more decentralized process of five regional communities and the overall accountabilities of the entire Rir s are not clear<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>Rergards <o:p></o:p></p></div></div></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><div><p class=MsoNormal>2015-03-08 15:06 GMT+01:00 Kavouss Arasteh <<a href="mailto:kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com" target="_blank">kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com</a>>:<o:p></o:p></p><div><div><p class=MsoNormal>Dear Patrik<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>Thank you for reply<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>The question addressed to two operational communities represented by Jari and Paul or Alan . If my request was not properly formulated I hereby correct that in raising these questions and seeking clarifications from protocol and numbers operational communities AND NOT to ANY ICG MEMBER <o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>Regards<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>Kavouss<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal> <br><br>Sent from my iPhone<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-bottom:12.0pt'><br>On 8 Mar 2015, at 09:47, Patrik F�ltstr�m <<a href="mailto:paf@frobbit.se" target="_blank">paf@frobbit.se</a>> wrote:<o:p></o:p></p></div><blockquote style='margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt'><div><div><p class=MsoNormal>All,<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>This I treat as a request from an ICG member for further explanation by other ICG members.<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal> Patrik<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-bottom:12.0pt'><br>Begin forwarded message:<o:p></o:p></p></div><blockquote style='margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt'><div><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-bottom:12.0pt'><b>From:</b> Kavouss Arasteh <<a href="mailto:kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com" target="_blank">kavouss.arasteh@gmail.com</a>><br><b>Date:</b> 8 mars 2015 08:30:25 CET<br><b>To:</b> Patrik F�ltstr�m <<a href="mailto:paf@frobbit.se" target="_blank">paf@frobbit.se</a>>, Mohamed El Bashir <<a href="mailto:mbashir@mbash.net" target="_blank">mbashir@mbash.net</a>>, Alissa Cooper <<a href="mailto:alissa@cooperw.in" target="_blank">alissa@cooperw.in</a>><br><b>Subject:</b> <b>Information requested</b><o:p></o:p></p></div></blockquote><blockquote style='margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt'><div><div><table class=MsoNormalTable border=0 cellpadding=0><tr><td style='padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm'><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#777777'>� </span><b>Patrik</b><span style='color:#777777'>, </span><b>Mohamed</b><span style='color:#777777'>, Alissa, WUKnoben, ICG </span><o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#777777;border:solid windowtext 1.0pt;padding:0cm'><img border=0 width=100 height=100 id="_x0000_i1025" src="cid:~WRD000.jpg" alt="Image removed by sender."></span><o:p></o:p></p></div></td></tr></table><div><div><div><div><p class=MsoNormal>Step 2 ,ICG Assessement of Cummunity proposals<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>Dear Vice chair, <o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>May you please ask Jari and Alan Barret or Paul Wilson to provide the foloowings;<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>A COMPARATIVE Table indicating the prcess of accountability currently in force and implemented and those which will be required after Transitiion.<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>It would be useful to have that comparative Table enabling ICG Members to better undersatnd how the accountability of Protocol Parameter and Numbers are affected by Transition.<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>The reports of these two communities are difficult to make such a comparision.<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>Without that I will have serious difficulties to comment on the exacteness and appropriateness of the content of these two comminities on accountability before and after transition.<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>By the way, Jari promised to provide a graphic Diagram regarding internal accountability being carried out by IETF<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>mOREOVER, aLAN bARRET / Paul Wilson ,are respectfully requested to provide similar graphic Diagram about the accountability currently in force in RIRs ,in particular that RIRs have a more decentralized process of five regional communities and the overall accountabilities of the entire Rir s are not clear<o:p></o:p></p></div><div><p class=MsoNormal>Rergards <o:p></o:p></p></div></div></div></div></div></div></blockquote></div></blockquote></div></div><blockquote style='margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt'><div><p class=MsoNormal>_______________________________________________<br>Internal-cg mailing list<br><a href="mailto:Internal-cg@ianacg.org" target="_blank">Internal-cg@ianacg.org</a><br><a href="http://ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org" target="_blank">http://ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org</a><o:p></o:p></p></div></blockquote></div></div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div><p class=MsoNormal><br><br><o:p></o:p></p><pre>_______________________________________________<o:p></o:p></pre><pre>Internal-cg mailing list<o:p></o:p></pre><pre><a href="mailto:Internal-cg@ianacg.org" target="_blank">Internal-cg@ianacg.org</a><o:p></o:p></pre><pre><a href="http://ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org" target="_blank">http://ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org</a><o:p></o:p></pre></blockquote><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div></div></div><p class=MsoNormal style='margin-bottom:12.0pt'><br>_______________________________________________<br>Internal-cg mailing list<br><a href="mailto:Internal-cg@ianacg.org">Internal-cg@ianacg.org</a><br><a href="http://ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org" target="_blank">http://ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org</a><o:p></o:p></p></div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div><p class=MsoNormal>_______________________________________________<br>Internal-cg mailing list<br><a href="mailto:Internal-cg@ianacg.org">Internal-cg@ianacg.org</a><br>http://ianacg.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg_ianacg.org<o:p></o:p></p></div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div></div></div></div></body></html>