[Internal-cg] Thoughts on proposal assessments

Patrik Fältström paf at frobbit.se
Thu Jul 9 23:10:29 UTC 2015


On 9 Jul 2015, at 21:01, Alissa Cooper wrote:

>> This is mistaken because the CCWG's work (workstream 1) will be formally incorporated into the CWG proposal.
>> NTIA has made it clear that they are basically part of the same proposal, and we are responsible for sending them to NTIA.
>
> I do not believe that is the plan actually. I thought they will remain two separate documents and while they will both be transmitted to NTIA via the ICANN Board, they will not be incorporated into a single document or even necessarily transmitted at the same time or in the same communication between the Board and NTIA.

Speaking personally, I have always expected the possibility of references between the two documents, but never that one was incorporated into the other. ICG and CCWG [work stream 1] are parallell processes. Not one being the parent of the other.

Two documents that are submitted to NTIA.

Nothing more, nothing less.

   Patrik
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 203 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://mm.ianacg.org/pipermail/internal-cg_ianacg.org/attachments/20150710/aa0a3a0f/attachment.asc>


More information about the Internal-cg mailing list